Electric Bikes: Government Opposition And Its Reasons

Electric bikes are becoming increasingly popular, but there is some concern about the government's stance on them. While the government has stated that it wants to make e-cycles more attractive, there are several reasons why they might be against them. These include the blurring of lines between e-bikes and electric motorbikes, which has caused access problems and trail conflict, as well as the high cost of e-cycles, which puts them out of reach for many people. There are also concerns that making e-bikes more powerful could reduce the health benefits of cycling and create more bureaucracy for owners.

Electric bikes are prohibitively expensive for many people

The Bicycle Association, fire services and electrical safety bodies are keen to work on this, but instead, the government gives them a consultation on throttles and wattage. The Bicycle Association has long stood against proposed changes to current legislation, seeing the suggested 'progression' as potentially disastrous for the future of e-bikes. Peter Eland, technical and policy director at the Bicycle Association, commented:

> These proposals put at risk the whole appeal of e-bikes – a key part of which is the light touch bureaucracy that goes with e-bike ownership and use, in contrast to mopeds which fall under motor vehicle regulations.

Organisations promoting cycling in the UK saw the proposals as unhelpful and likely to reduce the health benefits that come with pedalling. In the mountain bike world, the blurring of lines between e-bikes and electric motorbikes has often been a concern, with electric motorbikes being cited as causing access problems and trail conflict. Electric motorbikes are not allowed on bridleways or mountain bike trails, and many landowners and trail builders have complained of the damage caused by such motorbikes.

Electric bikes are seen as causing access problems and trail conflict

Organisations promoting cycling in the UK saw the government's proposed changes to e-bike legislation as unhelpful, and likely to reduce the health benefits that come with pedalling. Peter Eland, technical and policy director at the Bicycle Association, which has long stood against proposed changes to current legislation, sees the suggested 'progression' as potentially disastrous for the future of e-bikes. "These proposals put at risk the whole appeal of e-bikes - a key part of which is the light touch bureaucracy that goes with e-bike ownership and use, in contrast to mopeds which fall under motor vehicle regulations," he commented.

The government has stated that the proposed changes would make e-cycles more attractive, yet the most commonly cited reason for people not cycling is that they don’t feel safe. The Bicycle Association, fire services and electrical safety bodies are keen to work on this, but instead the government gives them a consultation on throttles and wattage.

E-cycles are also prohibitively expensive for many people. While the government’s goal to get more people to enjoy the benefits of e-cycles is commendable, the way to do that effectively is to invest in high-quality infrastructure and provide financial assistance for those who need it.

Electric bikes are not allowed on bridleways or mountain bike trails

The government is currently consulting on legalising higher-powered e-bikes, which has been met with some opposition. Organisations promoting cycling in the UK are concerned that this will reduce the health benefits that come with pedalling. There are also concerns that this will lead to more bureaucracy for e-bike owners, as they will fall under motor vehicle regulations.

The Bicycle Association, fire services and electrical safety bodies are keen to work with the government on this issue, but they have instead been consulted on throttles and wattage. The government's main rationale for the proposed changes is to make e-bikes a more attractive and viable travel option for more people. However, some believe that the way to do this effectively is to invest in high-quality infrastructure and provide financial assistance for those who need it.

Electric bikes are causing damage to trails

The government has been consulting on legalising higher-powered e-bikes, which has been met with opposition from organisations promoting cycling in the UK. They argue that making e-bikes more powerful is unhelpful and likely to reduce the health benefits that come with pedalling.

The Bicycle Association, in particular, has long stood against proposed changes to current legislation, seeing the suggested 'progression' as potentially disastrous for the future of e-bikes. They argue that making e-bikes more powerful risks putting them under motor vehicle regulations, which would increase the bureaucracy and costs associated with e-bike ownership and use.

Instead of focusing on increasing power, the government should invest in high-quality infrastructure and provide financial assistance to make e-bikes more accessible to a wider range of people. This would help achieve the goal of getting more people to enjoy the benefits of e-cycles without causing damage to trails.

Electric bikes are not seen as a safe mode of transport

Electric bikes are not seen as a viable mode of transport for several reasons. Firstly, they are prohibitively expensive for many people. While the government's goal is to get more people to enjoy the benefits of e-cycles, the way to do that effectively is to invest in high-quality infrastructure and provide financial assistance for those who need it. Secondly, there is a concern that electric bikes blur the lines between e-bikes and electric motorbikes. Electric motorbikes are not allowed on bridleways or mountain bike trails, and they have been cited as causing access problems and trail conflict. Many landowners and trail builders have complained about the damage caused by such motorbikes. Thirdly, organisations promoting cycling in the UK see the government's focus on throttles and wattage as unhelpful and likely to reduce the health benefits that come with pedalling. They argue that the government should make e-bikes cheaper, not more powerful, if they want to encourage more people to cycle. Finally, the government's proposed changes to e-bike legislation could put at risk the whole appeal of e-bikes by bringing them under motor vehicle regulations.

Frequently asked questions